Weird Things We've Encountered 6: Pre-Wedding Photos

When we were looking at photographers back in the day, I was quite determined to get a simple package that was affordable and served to document the day. It wasn't until I actually started shopping around for photographers (and interviewing a few terribad ones that rubbed me the wrong way) that I realized that the process is far more complex than just "show up" and "take photos" and "give photos".

Well, okay, I had some idea from my photographer friends. But I didn't really get it from the client's perspective until now.

Read More

Weird Things We've Encountered 5: Western Wedding Games

Continuing on from my previous post about Chinese door games, which take place the morning of the wedding and involve only the bridal party (and in particular, the wanton humiliation of the groomsmen), the Western side of things traditionally involves games played after you're married. As you likely know, these take place during the reception and seem to try to involve as many single people at your wedding as possible.

We hadn't really considering either Chinese or Western games at our wedding, purely because it sounded like way too much additional planning and/or thinking. Surprisingly, it was our wedding DJs who first mentioned the Western games to us, providing us with a long, long list of games to play at our wedding. With the lone exception of the bouquet toss (which we aren't doing), every single one of the games listed is horrifyingly awkward.

The one that Blake finds the funniest is to get people paired off (single or otherwise) in a slow-dance and wedge a balloon between them. The first pair to pop their balloon wins, where the awkward part is that you can only pop the balloon by applying pressure with your bodies. And unless one of you has a pin hidden in your belt, it generally involves lots and lots of hilarious-looking wiggling.

The one that I find the most awkward and the absolute worst is perhaps one of the most popular - the garter. I've only seen it in movies (as of the time of this post), never in person, and I remember wondering what on earth was going on. It seemed a lot weird to me that the single ladies at the reception get to catch a flying bunch of flowers while the single guys get to catch something that I'd been wearing on my thigh! I shudder at the thought, really. Not for me, noooooooope.

Most of the games seem to focus on just unmarried singles or just married couples, which is another thing that bothers me. A lot of the games seem to be about pairing people up if you're not paired up already, or the expectation that you will be paired up in the future and won't you be lucky then? I'm all about potentially embarrassing people for a good-natured laugh when appropriate, but I don't like perpetuating the stereotype that everyone has to be with someone to be happy. Ironic given that we're talking about our wedding, but just because it works for us doesn't mean it works (or should work) for anyone else. I could be reading too much into this but it really does make me uncomfortable, probably because I know a lot of people are made to feel like shit just because they're single, even if they might want to be.

As it is, Blake and I find it pretty weird that the DJ is the one suggesting these wedding games to us, and all the games strike us as archaic or perpetuating traditions with which we don't relate. We get that they'll be funny and that's cool and all, but we still don't want to do them. We will set up other things to keep people entertained, but at the end of the day there will be music and alcohol. What else do you really need?

Weird Things We've Encountered 4: Chinese Door Games

Most of the other posts I've made in the WTWE series have been relatively interesting and about certain things you wouldn't necessarily know if you weren't also planning a civil ceremony in Australia in place of your original plan to do it in Singapore. This one, though, does kind of shine the spotlight on the utter weirdness of traditional wedding "games", with which I'm sure most of you have had some experience.

Let me touch briefly on Chinese wedding games. They're called "door games", which are typically played between the bridesmaids and the groomsmen when the groom comes to pick up the bride to whisk her off to the ceremony. It's a lot of teasing and silliness where the bridesmaids try to prevent the groom from entering the bride's home, where the bride, fully dressed and ready to go, is stashed away in a room somewhere.

It's a way for the groom to demonstrate how committed he and his groomsmen are to getting past the "trials" and "tests" set forth by the bridesmaids to be able to take the bride. It's also a way for the bridesmaids to demonstrate how much they love their bride by not letting her go without requiring the suitor prove his worthiness to them.

The games themselves are anything from doing x number of push-ups to waxing the groomsmen's legs. A pretty common game is to make the groom eat something super sweet, something super spicy, super sour, and super bitter; this is meant to represent how a marriage can be all 4 of those things and to see if the groom can stomach them. An acquaintance's bridesmaids had set up the front lawn of her house as the set of a quiz show, where the final prize was the bride.

That game they play with the business card on Clueless? Suck and blow? Where you have to pass a business card from one person to the next using only your mouth? Another popular one.

And of course there's always bringing a hoard of hongbao (the Chinese red envelopes) stuffed with cash and just buying the bride off the bridesmaids. Lazier and a bit more capitalist, sure, but efficient.

Things can get overboard really easily, and you're only limited by the imagination and commitment of each member of the bridal party. It's essentially the Chinese version of the hens' or bucks' party, just on a smaller and (usually) less debauched scale. I do think it's a cool way for the bridal party to spend some time together before the wedding and to alleviate the anxieties of the day, but I do also think that because it only involves your bridal party, it can be a bit exclusive.

While this sounds really fun, logistically it's just not going to pan out for us, not least because it's a bit much for just my sister to plan and do on her own when she's not even in the same country! More importantly, there's a lot of commentary to be had about gender and culture and the way these are represented in the games. I get that the games are meant to be in good fun, but that doesn't mean I have to want them or like them if I don't approve of the more subversive message the whole tradition sends.

Weird Things We've Encountered 3: Gold

Those of you who know me well know that when I put my mind to doing something important, I go full-on nerd with it. I research, I read, bug people in the know, research some more, compare research, etc. I take notes. And usually the higher the stakes, the more research goes in, the more notes are taken, the more people are bugged. This not all together unusual human behaviour, but it does lead you down the path of some interesting and unexpected revelations.

While searching for the perfect "ring" (I am not wearing an engagement ring and instead am going to get just one to represent both), I read up on gold and gemstones and all that jazz. As it turns out, Australia jewellers only use 9 carat gold or 18 carat gold. It is impossible to walk into a store in Australia and ask for any other carat gold.

I was befuddled by this standard. 9 carat gold, while harder, is far less durable than 18 carat gold. It's got less gold in the mix, meaning it's scratch resistant, but also tends to tarnish more quickly and trigger higher instances of allergic reactions in people with sensitivities to certain alloys. And while that might not bother some folks, getting it made as an everyday-all-day wedding ring is ill-advised.

By comparison, 18 carat gold is purer, softer, and far more durable. And, because of the higher gold content, it's way more expensive. Just about double the price, as the numbers imply. The result is you either have a very affordable material that's pretty crap for wedding ring wear, or you drop many many dollars on extra good gold. The lack of a "middle" ground confuses me greatly.

I still haven't figured out why this is the Australian industry standard; this does not appear to be information willingly shared with the lay person. Overseas, 14 carat gold is far more common, and is probably the most common material used in wedding rings these days. That's probably because it's pretty in-between hardness and durability, and it's more affordable than the 18 carat stuff.

18kgold.jpg

Doesn't that drive away people who are happy with 14 carat gold into buying rings from overseas? I mean, what with the internet these days and all, you're not locked into your local market if you really don't want to be! It's definitely an interesting choice, and I wonder what the rationale is for the 9/18 exclusivity here; I'm absolutely sure there is an explanation that makes sense, I just haven't encountered it yet!

If you've got some pro knowledge about why this is the situation in Australia (or if I'm somehow misinformed), I'd love to hear it!

Weird Things We've Encountered 2: Aussie Wording

"Weird" is a polite descriptor, here. "Archaic", "outdated", "exclusionary", and "offensive" would probably suit more. This is to do with the legal wording required in a marriage ceremony in Australia, first brought to my attention by a recently-wed coworker. Let me break it down.

In Australia, if you want to be legally married in a non-religious, civil ceremony, this must be done by an authorised celebrant. You can get the legal ceremony done-and-dusted at the Registry ("courthouse" style), or you can pay a celebrant to officiate at your wedding at a venue of your choice. The celebrant ensures all the legal boxes are ticked, including filing the paperwork on your behalf.

One of those legal boxes is to do with a paragraph of words that celebrants have to recite, word-for-word, at a certain point in your wedding. If they don't recite these words, you are not legally married in Australia. Here they are, verbatim:

I am duly authorised by law to solemnise marriages according to law. Before you are joined in marriage in my presence and in the presence of these witnesses, I am to remind you of the solemn and binding nature of the relationship into which you are now about to enter.

Marriage, according to law in Australia, is the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered into for life.
— Attorney General's Department, Australia

Source: http://www.ag.gov.au/Pages/default.aspx

Knowing me and Blake, have you spotted the bit where we might have a bit of a problem? It's one thing to believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman at an individual level, but it's almost a slap in the face to put it in words that are legally required by the Government. You don't have to share our level of disdain for this, but know that this is a Big Deal to us - marriage equality is something we both strongly believe in, and we are disappointed that Australia is lagging far behind the rest of the developed world on this issue.

On some level I think it also bothers me because I feel guilty hearing those words on my wedding day, knowing that there are friends and strangers out there who can't even get married. And while some folks out there could argue that a wedding is not the right place for a soapbox, then I reckon those folks don't know me - or Blake - very well at all.

Plus, it actually gets worse than that. Religious celebrants (i.e., those who can legally marry you in religious ceremonies rather than civil ones) don't have the same wording requirement.

Only authorised celebrants who are ministers of religion for a recognised denomination are not required to say these words.
— Attorney General's Department, Australia

<MASSIVE EYEROLL GOES HERE.>

There are a few ways forward that we can explore , and one of the big things for the wedding was to find a civil celebrant who'll work with us. We can't not have those words spoken, but let's just say the before and after is a bit more flexible.

Are there any other countries in the world where a statement like that is a legal requirement? If you got married in Australia and are just as uncomfortable (or moreso) as we are with it, how did you keep yourself from making a massively unphotogenic eyeroll?

Weird Things We've Encountered 1: Singaporean Scheduling

Those of you who found out pretty early on in the piece re: the engagement also know that the original plan was for us to have the whole shebang in Singapore. This would've meant the tea ceremony and legal wedding ceremony and a small reception dinner taking place overseas, with us having a casual celebratory party here in Perth for all our friends. That was our Plan A.

Unfortunately, as it turns out, Singapore is just not the place to go for a destination wedding. If neither you nor your partner are a Singaporean citizen, one of you must have resided in Singapore for 15 consecutive days immediately before the intended wedding date for your marriage to be legally solemnised there. This doesn't even include the day of your arrival in Singapore!

The Registrar shall not issue a marriage licence until he has been satisfied by Statutory Declaration made by each of the parties to the proposed marriage that:

a) for couples where at least one party is not a Singapore Citizen or Singapore Permanent Resident, one of the parties to the intended marriage must have been physically present in Singapore for at least 15 days preceding the date of the notice. (Please note that the day of arrival in Singapore is not included.);
— Registry of Marriages, Singapore

Source: http://app.rom.gov.sg/reg_info/rom_marriage_rules.asp

Now, I'm absolutely sure there is a logical reason for this. The prevention of Singapore turning into Las Vegas, possibly. But my brain just can't be bothered being open-minded and understanding about this, because it directly interferes with something I wanted! Anyway, I've already had a few hissy fits about it, and it's made a great addition to my long-running comedy series: Reasons Vivienne Finds Singapore Kind of Annoying Sometimes. Its 31st season has just debuted!

Has anyone managed to come up with some legit reasons for this particular policy? Or have you encountered it in other countries? I'd love to know!